Document Type : Original Article
Authors
1 PhD Student in International Law, Maragheh Branch, Islamic Azad University, Maragheh, Iran
2 Assistant Professor, Department of International Law, Urmia Branch, Islamic Azad University, Iran (Corresponding Author) dsoleimanzade@iaurmia.ac.ir
3 Assistant Professor of Law, Tehran Central Branch, Islamic Azad University Center, Tehran, Iran.
Abstract
The United Nations Charter presents the general principles of this organization and some of the legal issues related to it, and it is not similar to its statute. Therefore, it can be said that there is no executive-administrative document of the United Nations. In this research, the effect of the administrative flow of the United Nations on the important legal principle of resorting to force has been investigated by analytical-descriptive method. It was concluded that the secretariat of the UN institutions had a high authority to determine the time and manner of conducting the meetings, which can become a kind of time-buying factor. At the same time, the interpretive theory of the partial secretary can sometimes be a factor in leaving the topic off the agenda. Therefore, the minor secretary can base his interpretation comments on the draft resolution. Such acts of influence through administration are mainly evident during the affairs of the General Assembly. Also, the relationship of the United Nations with external institutions such as the International Atomic Energy Agency and the International Court of Justice is ambiguous, which can cause problems in the administrative process of sending files from those institutions to the United Nations. Therefore, the solution to remove such acts of influence is to limit the administrative affairs of the United Nations to the sources of written rights and remove the legal effect of the interpretive opinions of the secretaries, at the same time, the legal powers of the Secretary General can also be increased.
Keywords
)