The Islamic-Iranian model of compensation for moral damage caused by the mistakes of judges and its comparison with the French model

Poorzarin, Ali; Fallah Khariki, Mehdi; NikneJAd, Jawad

The Islamic-Iranian model of compensation for moral damage caused by the mistakes of judges and its comparison with the French model

Document Type : Original Article

Authors

Ali Poorzarin ¹

Mehdi Fallah Khariki ²

Jawad NikneJAd ³

¹ PhD student in private law, Ayatollah Amoli Branch, Islamic Azad University, Amol, Iran.

² Assistant Professor, Department of Private Law, Ayatollah Amoli Branch, Islamic Azad University, Amol, Iran.

³ Assistant Professor, Department of Private Law, West Tehran Branch, Islamic Azad University, Tehran, Iran

Abstract

One of the aspects of compensation is its spiritual type. This importance has been taken into consideration in the legal system of most countries and it has been formalized in our country by the Civil Liability Law approved in 1339.On the other hand, even taking into account the occupational immunities in the office of a judge, mistakes may occur on the part of judges as human beings (errors are allowed) in the courts and in the proceedings, and material or moral damage may be caused to individuals that cannot be compensated. It is against justice and fairness. This research has been done by analytical-descriptive method and tries to investigate the compensation of this type of damage caused by the mistakes of judges, from two aspects of the Iranian and French models. The result of the research is that in our country, the theory of civil liability has been recognized, which also applies to moral damages. If this damage is caused by the mistake of the judge, the damage can be considered from various aspects, including material and spiritual, but the procedures for dealing with it are somewhat unclear and have challenges. In France, the theory of unity of civil responsibility is accepted and without assigning special br

Keywords

Compensation

Moral damage

Judges

Civil liability

منابع

الف)منابع فارسی

1. ادیب، مجید (1395) اصول مسئولیت مدنی، تهران، نشر میزان، ج1، چ7.

2. بادینی، حسن (1395) فلسفه مسئولیت مدنی، تهران، شرکت سهامی انتشار، ج1، چ3.

3. حسینی‌نژاد، حسینقلی (1389) مسئولیت مدنی، تهران، انتشارات مجد، ج1، چ1.

4. حیاتی، علی‌عباس (1390) اجرای احکام مدنی در نظم حقوقی کنونی، تهران، بنیاد حقوقی میزان، ج1، چ2.

5. فرزانه، سعید؛ حیاتی، علی عباس (1399) آثار انتخاب نظریه وحدت یا تعدد مسئولیت مدنی بر تشریفات دعاوی خسارت در حقوق ایران و فرانسه، دوفصلنامه علمی مطالعات حقوق بشر اسلامی 9 (1) 113-142.

6. فرزانه، سعید؛ حیاتی، علی عباس (1400) ماهیت فقهی و حقوقی وجود شرط علم و عمد در جبران خسارت دادرسی، مجله فقهی فلسفی قم 12 (45) 1-20.

7. نقیبی ،سید ابوالقاسم،(1388)،خسارت معنوی در حقوق اسلام و ایران و نظامهای معاصر،تهران،انتشارات امیرکبیر،ج1،چ2.

8. فرهنگ لغت دهخدا.

9. فرهنگ لغت عمید.

10. فرهنگ لغت معین.

11. فرهنگ واژه های سره.

12. قاسم زاده، سید مرتضی (1398) مبانی مسئولیت مدنی، تهران، نشر میزان، ج1، چ3

13. کاتوزیان، ناصر (1386) الزام‌های خارج از قرارداد؛ ضَمان قهری، تهران، مؤسّسه‌ی انتشارات و چاپ دانشگاه تهران، ج1، چ8.

13.یوسفی صاقلو ،احمد؛سرمست، زینب(1397)مقایسه تطبیقی ارکان خسارت معنوی در حقوق ایران و فرانسه، تهران ، فصلنامه تحقیقات حقوق خصوصی و کیفری ،14، 3

ب)منابع لاتین

1. Borghetti, J. S. (2019). Civil Liability for Artificial Intelligence: What Should its Basis Be?. La Revue des Juristes de Sciences Po, (17), 94-102.‏

2. Brüggemeier, G. (2011). Modernising civil liability law in Europe, China, Brazil and Russia: texts and commentaries. Cambridge University Press.‏

3. Bueno, N., & Bright, C. (2020). Implementing Human Rights Due Diligence Through Corporate Civil Liability. International & Comparative Law Quarterly, 69(4), 789-818.‏

4. Feuillet, B. (2011). The Perruche case and french medical liability.

5. Frame, W. S., Mihov, A., & Sanz, L. (2017). Foreign investment, regulatory arbitrage, and the risk of US banking organizations.‏

6. Frey, A, (2013), "the role of indices in transferring of insurance risks to the capital markets", Swiss Re, Sigma, no.4/2009.

7. Ganilsy, M., & Wachtel, R. (2012). Civil Liability under French Law and PCI DSS. Int'l Bus. LJ, 122.‏

8. Ghaisary, S. A., Yousefzadeh, M., & Habib, M. (2020). Preventive civil liability and its educational principles in the high school social studies textbook. Revista Conrado, 16(76), 68-78.‏

9. Khorsand, B., & Parvin, F. (2020). A Comparative and Educational Study of Laws in Litigation of Religious Minorities in Iran and Lebanon. Iranian Journal of Comparative Education, 3(2), 724-736.‏